-
@JinnysJoe @k_a_stark @CollaterlyM @SlauHaus @JolyonMaugham @BBCNewsnight @hannahsbee @deb_cohen that's actually not correct - the judgement upheld Gillick competence, but said (imo wrongly) that kids needed to understand the effects of hormones as well as puberty blockers in order to consent to puberty blockers.Look on archive.org
❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
-
@JinnysJoe @k_a_stark @CollaterlyM @SlauHaus @JolyonMaugham @BBCNewsnight @hannahsbee @deb_cohen there's a summary of it from a legal point of view here wordpress.aber.ac.uk/law-and-criminology/2020/12/01/bell-v-tavistock-a-quick-explainer/ if you don't want to read the actual judgement itselfPermalink Look on archive.org