-
GPT is copyright laundering. @joshu/1283671523358695427Permalink Look on archive.org
♻️ 15 Retweets ❤️ 112 Favorites Mood 0
-
linking in this @aparrish thread @aparrish/1286808621494435846?s=20Permalink Look on archive.org
-
Permalink
Look on archive.org
-
Permalink
Look on archive.org
-
not entirely vibing with the original thread, but a good example of taking artists' work without consent or compensation, training a big computer on it, then directly selling the results back in a way that takes space & money from those artists @arvalis/1558632898336501761?t=34eHEVwkl-K_MadK_m7MgA&s=19Permalink Look on archive.org
-
imagine being ND Stevenson, building a career on telling a certain kind of story & conveying a certain kind of message, then someone rips your work, trains a computer on it, and uses that to generate work you disagree with entirely with your name attached as an abstract stylePermalink Look on archive.org
-
if you're going to claim meaning of an artwork is separable from it's style, then: 1) you're wrong 2) the moonlight carries the message of lovePermalink Look on archive.org
-
an artist listed in the above image: @simonstalenhag/1559817133294485504Permalink Look on archive.org
-
the way that "non commercial" datasets are collected by academic institutions that are funded by, work with and ultimately benefit commercial entities... @waxpancake/1575913653387546624Look on archive.org
-
"Copilot introduces what we might call a more selfish interface to open-source software... With Copilot, open-source users never have to know who made their software. They never have to interact with a community. They never have to contribute." githubcopilotinvestigation.com/Permalink Look on archive.org
-
one more for the copyright laundering thread @davemakes/1581922437939068928?t=2zyAvLOEBjfKlfRGM-wZVA&s=19Permalink Look on archive.org