v21’s avatarv21’s Twitter Archive—№ 36,354

      1. …in reply to @GalaxyKate
        @GalaxyKate i didn't even know you could push an array or rules... but it seems confusing to me because it's several layers down
    1. …in reply to @v21
      @GalaxyKate it effectively makes "," a special character everywhere (that you might later variable-ize)
  1. …in reply to @v21
    @GalaxyKate i guess late-resolution of symbols would be good - but i would make that have to be declared in the same level as the symbol
    1. …in reply to @v21
      @GalaxyKate ie [symb:thingy,thingy2,thingy3], where thingy{,2,3} are just treated as text (even then the syntax makes me unhappy)
      1. …in reply to @v21
        @GalaxyKate hm! late resolution is something i did explicitly want previously... hm hm hm!
        1. …in reply to @v21
          @GalaxyKate actually... i think i'd prefer if late resolution was a property of a symbol expansion, not a symbol definition.