-
@aiusepsi @vectorpoem Okay, so : he's in charge of Valve and could choose to, for example : - reduce the 30% cut - hire moderators & curators - not avoid taxPermalink Look on archive.org
Mood 0
-
@aiusepsi @vectorpoem These things would help others, at the risk of not making Valve more valuable / him richer.Look on archive.org
-
@aiusepsi @vectorpoem But ultimately hoping for those with vastly more power than you to choose to do the benevolent thing is... not the best.Permalink Look on archive.org
-
@aiusepsi @vectorpoem But, faced with that, saying "ah, but he'd have to sell his shares to do anything", as if those shares are inevitable and inexorable...Permalink Look on archive.org